tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7008243.post6386587985040105673..comments2024-01-04T06:07:46.546-06:00Comments on Blog THIS, Pal!: Doctoring HistoryGordon Dhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01048644813784102126noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7008243.post-79733807541211833172008-08-28T12:58:00.000-05:002008-08-28T12:58:00.000-05:00Actually, that should have been "purely historical...Actually, that should have been "purely historical" for BLACK ORCHID, since there were no science-fiction elements. <BR/><BR/>Completely my bad...and a good argument that one should never drink and proofread.Gordon Dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01048644813784102126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7008243.post-6840882296450962732008-08-28T07:54:00.000-05:002008-08-28T07:54:00.000-05:00You don't consider The Mark of the Rani a pseudo-h...You don't consider <I>The Mark of the Rani</I> a pseudo-historical? Luddites, George Stephenson? Or <I>The King's Demons</I>? King John? Magna Carta?Camera Obscurahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07366304095952901048noreply@blogger.com